Bar-headed goose into bird and chicks cloaca microbial of contrast analysis
Abstract
Intestinal Microbial by maintain steady-state, auxiliary digestion and promote immune system development and style maintenance host of health state. Intestinal micro-Biological itself by the host of gene, diet, age and environment and factors of influence. However intestinal microbial of change and Host Age Between the relationship still have many unknown. This study respectively collected bar-headed goose (Anser indicus) 2 only into bird and 3 only chicks cloaca samples, extraction intestinal microbial total DNA, the16 S rRNA High Flux sequencing of methods analysis, and compare the two age stage birds intestinal microbial of flora structure and composition difference. Study found bar-headed goose chicks cloaca microbial belongs 9A door content highest of before 5A door respectively. Shuttle of door (48.29%), Thick-walled bacteria door (22.21%), Deformation of the door (22.07%), Actinomycetes door (5.02%), and soft wall bacteria door (1.93%). Into bird cloaca microbial belongs 17A door most of in turn is the deformation of the door (64.69%), Thick-walled bacteria door (23.92%), Blue bacteria (8.48%), Actinomycetes door (1.43%), and shuttle of door (0.56%). In of the genus level bar-headed goose chicks cloaca microbial belongs 18A of made bird containing 24A. Into bird cloaca microbialα diversity was significantly higher than that chicks (P < 0.05Welch’sT-Test). 186A operation classification unit (OTU) belongs to into bird and chicks. There are other 640A OTU and 90A OTU, respectively belongs to into bird and chicks. Chicks in 67.39% of OTUs is into bird of some. Based on OUT, the clustering shows results and age group consensus. The results are to know birds intestinal microbial and host age change between the relationship that have certain reference value.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Colston TJ, Jackson CR. Microbiome evolution along divergent branches of the vertebrate tree of life: what is known and unknown. Molecular Ecology. 2016; 25(16): 3776-3800. doi: 10.1111/mec.13730
Eisen J. What does the term microbiome mean? And where did it come from? A bit of a surprise. The Winnower. 2015. doi: 10.15200/winn.142971.16196
Jovel J, Patterson J, Wang W, et al. Characterization of the Gut Microbiome Using 16S or Shotgun Metagenomics. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2016; 7. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00459
Barnes EM. The avian intestinal flora with particular reference to the possible ecological significance of the cecal anaerobic bacteria. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1972; 25(12): 1475-1479. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/25.12.1475
Lloyd-Price J, Abu-Ali G, Huttenhower C. The healthy human microbiome. Genome Medicine. 2016; 8(1). doi: 10.1186/s13073-016-0307-y
Kohl KD. Diversity and function of the avian gut microbiota. Journal of Comparative Physiology B. 2012; 182(5): 591-602. doi: 10.1007/s00360-012-0645-z
Ding J, Dai R, Yang L, et al. Inheritance and Establishment of Gut Microbiota in Chickens. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2017; 8. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01967
Flammer K, Drewes LA. Species-Related Differences in the Incidence of Gram-Negative Bacteria Isolated from the Cloaca of Clinically Normal Psittacine Birds. Avian Diseases. 1988; 32(1): 79. doi: 10.2307/1590952
Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30(15): 2114-2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
Magoč T, Salzberg SL. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2011; 27(21): 2957-2963. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507
Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Walters WA, et al. Using QIIME to Analyze 16S rRNA Gene Sequences from Microbial Communities. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics. 2011; 36(1). doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi1007s36
Caporaso JG, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, et al. PyNAST: a flexible tool for aligning sequences to a template alignment. Bioinformatics. 2009; 26(2): 266-267. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp636
DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, et al. Greengenes, a Chimera-Checked 16S rRNA Gene Database and Workbench Compatible with ARB. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2006; 72(7): 5069-5072. doi: 10.1128/aem.03006-05
Barbosa A, Balagué V, Valera F, et al. Age-Related Differences in the Gastrointestinal Microbiota of Chinstrap Penguins (Pygoscelis antarctica). Peter HU, ed. PLOS ONE. 2016; 11(4): e0153215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153215
Malmuthuge N, Griebel PJ, Guan LL. The Gut Microbiome and Its Potential Role in the Development and Function of Newborn Calf Gastrointestinal Tract. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2015; 2. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2015.000362010
Ley RE, Hamady M, Lozupone C, et al. Evolution of Mammals and Their Gut Microbes. Science. 2008; 320(5883): 1647-1651. doi: 10.1126/science.1155725
Dewar ML, Arnould JPY, Dann P, et al. Interspecific variations in the gastrointestinal microbiota in penguins. MicrobiologyOpen. 2013; 2(1): 195-204. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.66
Bennett DC, Tun HM, Kim JE, et al. Characterization of cecal microbiota of the emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae). Veterinary Microbiology. 2013; 166(1-2): 304-310. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.05.018
González-Braojos S, Vela AI, Ruiz-de-Castañeda R, et al. Age-related changes in abundance of enterococci and Enterobacteriaceae in Pied Flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) nestlings and their association with growth. Journal of Ornithology. 2011; 153(1): 181-188. doi: 10.1007/s10336-011-0725-y
Ahern PP, Faith JJ, Gordon JI. Mining the Human Gut Microbiota for Effector Strains that Shape the Immune System. Immunity. 2014; 40(6): 815-823. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.05.012
Edgar RC. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nature Methods. 2013; 10(10): 996-998. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2604
Kau AL, Ahern PP, Griffin NW, et al. Human nutrition, the gut microbiome and the immune system. Nature. 2011; 474(7351): 327-336. doi: 10.1038/nature10213
Kinross JM, Darzi AW, Nicholson JK. Gut microbiome-host interactions in health and disease. Genome Medicine. 2011; 3(3): 14. doi: 10.1186/gm228
Lee WJ, Hase K. Gut microbiota–generated metabolites in animal health and disease. Nature Chemical Biology. 2014; 10(6): 416-424. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1535
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18686/ppas.v1i1.1144
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.