A Diachronic Multimodal Analysis of How Dog Food Advertisements Construct Meanings for Promotion

Haocheng Yang

Abstract


Based on Michael Halliday’s systemic functional grammar and its important extend-visual grammar proposed by Gunther Kress and Theo Van Leeuwen, this paper aims at analyzing how different features in the dog food advertisements gather together to realize their functions of appealing, promotion, and persuading. By collecting and coding data in a diachronic sequence, this paper gives a case study in which 15 representative dog food advertisements from 1960s to present are thrown in to a multimodal discourse analysis framework. The findings, from the social semiotics perspective, shed light on figuring out main patterns of representational, interactive, and compositional meanings of dog food advertisements.

Keywords


Dog Food Advertisement; Multimodal Discourse Analysis; Meaning Construction; Visual Grammar

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database


References


Pope D. (2003). Making sense of advertisements. History matters: The US survey course on the Web.

Tsuchida A, Yamagishi M, Masuda K, & Oishi T. (2013). Trends in advertisement wording in a magazine targeting dog owners. Tokyo University of Agriculture.

Harris JL, Bargh JA, & Brownell KD. (2009). Priming effects of television food advertising on eating behavior. Health psychology, 28(4), 404.

Harris ZS. (1952). Discourse Analysis. Language. 28: 1-30.

Guo NS, & Feng D. (2015). Infusing multiliteracies into English language curriculum: The visual construction of knowledge in English textbooks from an ontogenetic perspective. Linguistics and Education, 31, 115-129.

Halliday MA. (1996). Literacy and linguistics: A functional perspective. Literacy in society, 339-376.

Kress GR. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning: the rhetorics of the science classroom. London: Continuum.

Halliday MA. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

Kress GR, & Van LT. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Psychology Press.

Davidenko N, Kopalle H, & Bridgeman B. (2019). The upper eye bias: Rotated faces draw fixations to the upper eye. Perception, 48(2), 162-174.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18686/mcs.v4i3.1493

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.