A Diachronic Multimodal Analysis of How Dog Food Advertisements Construct Meanings for Promotion
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1]Pope D. (2003). Making sense of advertisements. History matters: The US survey course on the Web.
[2]Tsuchida A, Yamagishi M, Masuda K, & Oishi T. (2013). Trends in advertisement wording in a magazine targeting dog owners. Tokyo University of Agriculture.
[3]Harris JL, Bargh JA, & Brownell KD. (2009). Priming effects of television food advertising on eating behavior. Health psychology, 28(4), 404.
[4]Harris ZS. (1952). Discourse Analysis. Language. 28: 1-30.
[5]Guo NS, & Feng D. (2015). Infusing multiliteracies into English language curriculum: The visual construction of knowledge in English textbooks from an ontogenetic perspective. Linguistics and Education, 31, 115-129.
[6]Halliday MA. (1996). Literacy and linguistics: A functional perspective. Literacy in society, 339-376.
[7]Kress GR. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning: the rhetorics of the science classroom. London: Continuum.
[8]Halliday MA. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
[9]Kress GR, & Van LT. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Psychology Press.
[10]Davidenko N, Kopalle H, & Bridgeman B. (2019). The upper eye bias: Rotated faces draw fixations to the upper eye. Perception, 48(2), 162-174.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18686/mcs.v4i3.1493
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.