Efficacy. ProTaper Next. removing filling materials from oval-Shaped canal during root canal retreatment
Abstract
AIM:. Assess. efficacy. removing. filling material from oval-Shaped canals. Pro-Taper Next rotary files.Methods:60 extracted human mandibular premolars. instrumented up. a size F2. ProTaper UniversalThen filled. gutta-Percha ", AH-Plus sealer using. continuous wave. condensation technique.Then. teeth. divided. 3 groups(N = 20).. Filling material. removed. hand files(H)ProTaper UniversalREtreatment(PTUR), ProTaper Next(PTN)... Debris extruded. apical foramen. collected, weighted.. Working time. recorded.Then. teeth. split longitudinallyObserved
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ng YLMann VRAhbaran SEt al.Offshoot. primary root canal treatment:Systematic re-view. Literature-Part Effects. study characteristics. probability. success. J. .Int Endod J200740(12):921
KeleArslan HKamalakEt al.REmoval. filling materials from oval-Shaped canals U-sing laser irradiation:A Micro-Computed.-mographic study. J. .J Endod.201541(2):219-224.
Stabholz,Friedman s.Endodontic retreat-ment-Case Selection and Technique.Part 2:Treatment Planning for treatment. J. .J endod,1988,14.(12):607-614.
Zuolo,Mello jj,CunhaRS,Et al.Efficiency of referral and rotary techniques for remo-ving filing material duration root canal retreat-ment. J. .Int endod J,2013,46(10):947-953.
Crozeta BM,Silva-Sousa yt,Leoni GB,Et al.Micro-Computed Tomography Study of fill-ing material removal from oval-Shaped canals by Using Rotary,Recipitocating,And adaptive motion systems. J. .J endod,2016,42(5.):793-797.
Ozyurek t,Ozsezer-Demiryurek E.Efficiency of ProTaper next and ProTaper universal retreat-ment systems in removing gutta-Percha in curved root canal duration root canal retreat. J. .J Istanbul Univ FAC dent,2017,51(2.):-13..
Nevares g,De Albuquerque DSFreire LGEt al.Efficacy. ProTaper NEXT compared. reciproc. removing obturation material from severely curved root canals:A Micro-Compu-ted tomography study. J. .J Endod.201642(5):803-808.
Wu MKWesselink PR.A Primary observation. preparation, obturation. oval canals. J. .Int Endod J200134(2):137-141.
Schneider Electric SW.A comparison. canal prepara-tions. straight, curved root canals. J. .O-ral Surg Oral Med Oral pathol197132(2):271-275.
Silva EJOrlowsky NBHerrera DREt al.Ef-fectiveness. rotatory, reciprocating move-ments. root canal filling material removal. J. .
Ozyurek TDemiryurek EO.Efficacy. differ-Ent Nickel-Titanium instruments. Removing Gutta-Percha "during root canal retreatment. J. .J Endod.201642(4):646-649.
GergiRSabbagh C.Effectiveness. Two nickel-Titanium rotary instruments, A hand file. re-moving gutta-Percha ". severely curved root Ca-NaLS during retreatment:An ex vivo study. J. .Int Endod J200740(7/):532-537.
De Carvalho MAZaccaro SM.Efficacy. au-tomated versus hand instrumentation during root canal retreatment:An ex vivo study. J. .Int Endod J200639(10):779-784.
Hulsmann MStotz S.EfficacyCleaning abil-ity, safety. different devices. gutta-Percha "removal. root canal retreatment. J. .Int Endod J199730(4):227-233.
KfirTsesis IYakirevich EEt al.The ef-ficacy of five techniques for removal root fill-ing material:Microscopic versus Radiographic Evaluation. J. .Int endod J,2012,45(1.):-41.
ROggendorf MJ,Legner m,Ebert J,Et al.Mi-cro-CT Evaluation of residential material in Ca-als filled with active GP or guttaflow following removal with NiTi instruments. J. .Int endod J,2010,43(3.):200-209.
ROdig t,REicherts P,Konietschke F,Et al.Efficiency of quarantine and rotary NiTi U-ments for treatment of curved root canals as-sessions by micro-CT. J. .Int endod J,2014,47(10):942-948.
Colaco,Pai vaR.Comparative evaluation of the efficiency of manual and rotary gutta-Percha removal techniques. J. .J endod,2015,41(11):1871-1874.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18686/den.v1i1.1191
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
